翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ "O" Is for Outlaw
・ "O"-Jung.Ban.Hap.
・ "Ode-to-Napoleon" hexachord
・ "Oh Yeah!" Live
・ "Our Contemporary" regional art exhibition (Leningrad, 1975)
・ "P" Is for Peril
・ "Pimpernel" Smith
・ "Polish death camp" controversy
・ "Pro knigi" ("About books")
・ "Prosopa" Greek Television Awards
・ "Pussy Cats" Starring the Walkmen
・ "Q" Is for Quarry
・ "R" Is for Ricochet
・ "R" The King (2016 film)
・ "Rags" Ragland
・ ! (album)
・ ! (disambiguation)
・ !!
・ !!!
・ !!! (album)
・ !!Destroy-Oh-Boy!!
・ !Action Pact!
・ !Arriba! La Pachanga
・ !Hero
・ !Hero (album)
・ !Kung language
・ !Oka Tokat
・ !PAUS3
・ !T.O.O.H.!
・ !Women Art Revolution


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Copa Rio (International) : ウィキペディア英語版
Copa Rio (international tournament)

The Copa Rio (''Rio Cup'') was the first intercontinental soccer club tournament. Brazilian press, at the time, dubbed it as "club world cup", a title that would later be applied to the Toyota Cup. Copa Rio presented a format resembling the one adopted by FIFA in the first edition of FIFA Club World Cup held in 2000.
The two editions of Copa Rio took place in Rio de Janeiro and São Paulo, Brazil and were organized by the Brazilian Football Confederation (CBD), and endorsed by FIFA. The competition was originally planned to be held every two years, therefore the second edition should have been staged in 1953. However, it was moved forward to 1952 due to a request of Fluminense, which coorganized the 1952 edition along with the CBD as part of that club's 50th Anniversary celebrations.

In 1951, Palmeiras, from Brazil, was the winner of the tournament, while Fluminense, also from Brazil and coorganizer of the 1952 event, won this title in 1952.
The competition was succeeded by another tournament, named Torneio Octogonal Rivadavia Corrêa Meyer, which was won by Vasco da Gama, of Brazil. This tournament which succeeded Copa Rio had a different composition, with the predominance of Brazilian teams (five Brazilian sides, and three foreign clubs),〔Originally, the 1953 competition was supposed to include four Brazilian teams and four foreign teams, but the Uruguayan Football Association prohibited Club Nacional de Montevideo from participating on the verge of the competition, and this club was replaced by Fluminense, as there was not enough time to search for a foreign substitute.〕 thus, losing part of its intercontinental aspect. In December 2007, in a negative response to a Palmeiras' request, FIFA decided that the first World Club Cup was played in 2000, thus not recognizing Copa Rio as an official FIFA competition.
In Brazil, the competition was truly regarded as a Club World Cup, and the participating Brazilian teams (Vasco da Gama, Palmeiras, Corinthians, Fluminense) entitled to it a level of importance they would later entitle only to major football trophies such as the Brazilian League, the Copa Libertadores, the Intercontinental Cup and the FIFA Club World Cup. In Brazil, the Copa Rio was regarded as more important than the Venezuelan contemporary international competition, the Pequeña Copa del Mundo. While in 1951 Vasco da Gama cancelled a trip to Europe in order to play the Copa Rio, in 1953 Vasco da Gama declined the invitation to play the "Pequeña Copa de Mundo 1953", which was eventually played and won by Corinthians (which was invited to the Venezuelan competition only after Vasco declined to participate in it).
According to contemporary Brazilian newspapers "O Estado de S. Paulo" and "Jornal do Brasil" and Spanish newspaper "El Mundo Deportivo", the original idea was to invite the champion clubs from Rio de Janeiro State League, São Paulo State League (''back then there was no National League in Brazil, and São paulo and Rio de Janeiro were, and still are, the country's strongest soccer powerhouses''), Portugal (due to historical bonds of affection between Brazil and Portugal. Portugal was invited to the 1950 World Cup to replace other selections, but ended up declining because of the cost of the trip to Brazil, which has also led other teams to refuse the invitation to the 1950 World Cup〔http://www.copanaafrica2010.com/2008/01/copa-de-1950-curiosidades/〕), Uruguay, Italy, Sweden, Spain and England (the countries which had ranked top in the FIFA World Cup 1950, held in Brazil). According to the original plan, countries such as France, Argentina, USSR, Hungary, Czechoslovakia and West Germany (''which were then regarded as important soccer powerhouses'') were not to be invited as they did not participate in the FIFA World Cup 1950. However, the French side Nice ended up being accepted at the competition following the organisers's failure to bring a Spanish side to it. Also due to the failure in bringing teams from England and Sweden, the competition organisers ended up accepting as substitutes clubs from Austria (back then the biggest winning country at the Mitropa Cup) and Yugoslavia (which followed the top rank of the FIFA World Cup 1950). In 1952, the Brazilian Football Confederation invited teams from Argentina and West Germany, which were not invited for the 1951 edition of the tournament.
Some clubs were invited to the competition and decided not to participate:
In 1951: AC Milan (Italy), FC Barcelona (Spain), Atletico de Madrid (Spain), Tottenham Hotspur (England) and Newcastle United (England).
In 1952: Juventus (Italy), Internazionale (Italy), Millonarios (Colombia), Hibernian (Scotland), Newcastle United (England), Barcelona (Spain), Real Madrid (Spain) and Nice (France).
This apparently is due to the concurrence of the Latin Cup on dates nearby, as in 1951 AC Milan and Atletico de Madrid played the Latin Cup, having Milan stated to the Brazilian FA that its withdrawal from the 1951 Copa Rio was due to the Latin Cup, wheres Nice withdrew from the Latin Cup 1951 in order to play the Copa Rio 1951; whereas in 1952 Barcelona, Nice and Juventus played the Latin Cup, having Juventus stated to the Brazilian FA that its withdrawal from the 1952 Copa Rio was due to the Latin Cup. As for the Real Madrid invitation in 1952, the Spanish club negotiated both with the Brazilian FA and with the Venezuelan FA, and ended up playing the Venezuelan competition called "Pequeña Copa del Mundo", staged simultaneously to Copa Rio 1952. Millonarios (Colombia) declined the invitation in 1952 on grounds that the club was committed to participating at the "Pequeña Copa del Mundo". Internazionale (Italy) declined on grounds that the club's Directing Board felt that the team was not "leveled up to such competition" following a crashing defeat to minor Italian side Pro-Patria. As for the British declinations (Tottenham Hotspurs and Newcastle in 1951, Newcastle and Hibernian in 1952), there is no source providing an explanation to that, but the sheer indifference of the British to the Intercontinental Cup (shown in the 1970s) suggest that their non-participation in Copa Rio may most probably have derived simply from sheer indifference on their part to intercontinental club competitions or in the case of Tottenham Hotspurs, perhaps by financial problems, which ended up canceling his escursao in Argentina in April 1, 1951.
Some clubs accepted the invitation to participante but weren't able to do so, while other clubs requested participation and were denied. In 1951 Mexican club Atlas requested participation and was denied, while the Indian Football Association requested the participation of a national club and was also denied. In 1952 the Argentinian FA denied authorization for its national champion (Racing Avellaneda) to participate, while Nuremberg (West Germany) was prevented from participating in 1952 due to a West Germany 1950-1952 Federal Law prohibiting national clubs from participating in tournaments abroad (FC Saarbrücken took its berth, since that Law did not apply to clubs from the Saarland Protectorate due to political reasons). In 1952, Dinamo Zagreb (then Yugoslavia, presently Croatia) requested participation and was denied. Also in 1952, Uruguayan Peñarol withdrew from the competition in its semi-final, having a W.O. in the second semi-final leg match against Corinthians, alleging "lack of security" after their first semi-final leg match ended in a bad brawl.
Apparently due to the difficulties in bringing European sides to compete in Brazil (as stated on "Estado de São Paulo" newspaper articles from 1952 June 25 through 29th), the CBD (Brazilian Football Confederation) decided that in 1953 its intercontinental competition should have not 2 Brazilian sides and 6 foreign sides, but 4 Brazilian sides and 4 foreign sides. The schedule of the 1953 competition was formed in this exact manner; however, the Uruguayan Football Association prohibited Club Nacional de Montevideo from participating on the verge of the start of the competition, and this club was replaced by Brazilian side Fluminense, as there was not enough time to search for a foreign substitute, thus the competition ended up including 5 Brazilian sides (instead of 4) and 3 foreign sides (instead of 4). The 1953 competition also saw some clubs being invited and declining to participate, while two clubs were invited, accepted to participate but then were uninvited by the Brazilian Football Confederation: West German side Rot Weiss (from Essen) and Partisan (from Belgrade, Serbia, then Yugoslavia). In the case of Rot Weiss Essen, its invitation followed its wininning of the German Cup, and its uninvitation followed a ''4 X 0'' defeat it suffered (in a friendly match in its home town of Essen) to the Rio de Janeiro's club America FC (not seen as a top Rio de Janeiro club), which made the Brazilian FA doubt the technical strength of the German club and then uninvite it. Due to this uninvitaton, the German club sued the Brazilian FA for financial compensation, taking the case to FIFA (the result of the Rot Weiss's demand at FIFA is unknown). Despite the different name and the different foreign/Brazilian ratio of teams, some 1953 sources (1953 editions of both São Paulo newspaper O Estado de S. Paulo and Barcelona newspaper El Mundo Deportivo) referred to the 1953 tournament as the same tournament of 1951-1952, while other sources (RSSSF and 1953 editions of Rio de Janeiro newspaper Jornal do Brasil) treated the 1953 tournament as being a successor to the 1952 tournament.〔The sources are available only in Portuguese and Spanish languages and are available on Portuguese language Wikipedia articles on the subject.〕
It has been proven that FIFA officials Stanley Rous and Ottorino Barassi have participated in the organisation of the competition in 1951, Stanley Rous mainly as far as the negotiations with European clubs are concerned, whereas Barassi not only did that but also helped delineate the framework of the competition. It is also a proven fact that Ottorino Barassi participated in the organisation of the competition in 1952, though in the 1952 case the evidence exists that he did it through telephone contact, there not being evidence that he came to Brazil personally in 1952, while in the 1951 case the evidence proves that he travelled several times to Brazil to deal with the Brazilian FA and that he was in Brazil during the competition.〔
The Italian press regarded the competition as an "impressive project" that "was greeted so enthusiastically by FIFA officialls Stanley Rous and Jules Rimet to the extent of almost giving it an official FIFA stamp".〔(Corriere dello Sport: Claudio Carsughi - Tra Rio de Janeiro e San Paolo l´avvio del "Torneo dei Campioni" - página 3(acervo) ), 30/06/1951〕 and as a competition that inspired the creation of the European Champions Cup from which it derives Intercontinental Cup.〔(La Stampa Per Boniperti, Parola ed Altafini sarà una tournée piena di ricordi e nostalgie ), 30 de junho de 1975 - página: 10〕 Commenting the 1951 Juventus' acceptance to participate in the tournament, the Italian press stated that "a Italian club could not be missing in such an important and worldwide-reaching event".〔http://www.emeroteca.coni.it/bookreader.php?&c=1&f=9961&p=3#page/4/mode/1up〕
==1951 Copa Rio==


抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Copa Rio (international tournament)」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.